Analysis of a work of art in grades 5–7 of institutions of general secondary education: methodological commentary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2308-8885-2025-2(116)20-30Keywords:
analysis of work of art, fine arts lesson, art education field, graphic work, sculpture, decorative and applied art, architectural workAbstract
The article provides methodological reccomendations on the analysis of a sculptural work (circular, monumental sculpture), a graphic work (book graphics), a work of decorative and applied art (vytynanka) and architecture (architecture of three-dimensional structures) in grades 5-7 in fine arts lessons of institutions of secondary education taking into account the age characteristics of adolescents, means of organizing independent research and search, creative activities of students.
Attention is given to the common features in the perception, analysis, and interpretation of graphic works, sculpture, decorative and applied arts, and architecture, as well as to the differences in their analysis compared to painting. The authors emphasize that each type of art has its own unique means of expression, and understanding these is key to analyzing and interpreting works of art. Studying the historical, cultural, and social context of a piece helps reveal the artist’s intention.
Common aspects in analyzing paintings, graphic works, sculptures, decorative and applied arts, and architectural works include examining composition, form and space, light, technique, emotional impact, cultural context, and symbolism. Significant differences include the analysis of space (paintings and graphic works are two-dimensional and create an illusion of space; sculpture is three-dimensional and exists in real space; architecture is three-dimensional and forms real space for human life and activity; in decorative and applied arts, spatial analysis depends on the type of work), materials used, functionality (painting and graphics are mainly aesthetic; sculpture can be both aesthetic and functional; architecture combines functionality and aesthetics; decorative and applied arts serve both functions), and artistic form (painting: analysis of colour, light and shadow, perspective; graphics: analysis of line, stroke, tone; sculpture: analysis of volume, plasticity, silhouette; architecture: analysis of layout, construction, proportions; decorative and applied arts: analysis of decoration, materials, etc.).
The article includes an example of how the same work of art can be analyzed in grades 5, 6, and 7 according to the topics studied in the integrated course “Art.”
References
Barbe-Gall, F. (2014). Yak rozmovliaty z ditmy pro mystetstvo [How to talk to children about art]. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Staroho Leva.
Wilson, M. (2024). Mystetstvo bez taiemnyts. 50 mystetskykh tvoriv: znaiomstvo, doslidzhennia, poiasnennia [Art unpacked: 50 Works of art: Uncovered, explored, explained]. Kyiv: ArtHuss.
Hessel, K. (2024). Istoriia mystetstva bez cholovikiv [The story of art without men]. Kyiv: ArtHuss.
Gombrich, E. H. (2024). Opovid pro mystetstvo [Story about art]. Kyiv: ArtHuss.
The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2020). Derzhavnyi standart bazovoi serednoi osvity [State Standard of Basic Secondary Education] (Resolution No. 898, September 30). Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-deyaki-pitannya-derzhavnih-standartiv-povnoyi-zagalnoyi-serednoyi-osviti-i300920-898.
Kondratova, V. V., & Orlova, A. V. (2025). Alhorytm analizu tvoru mystetstva u 5-7 klasakh ZZSO [Algorithm for analyzing an artwork in grades 5-7 of institutions of general secondary education]. Mystetstvo ta Osvita [Art and Education], 1, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.32405/2308-8885-2025-1(115)-39-47
Levytska, M. (2015). Doslidzhennia tvoru mystetstva: opys – analiz – interpretatsiia [Studying a work of art: Description – analysis – interpretation]. Mystetskyi almanakh «Artes». Retrieved from https://artes-almanac.com/opys_analiz_interpretacija/
Nova ukrainska shkola [New Ukrainian School]. Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/zagalna%20serednya/nova-ukrainska-shkola-compressed.pdf.
Profesiinyi standart «Vchytel zakladu zahalnoi serednoi osvity» [Professional Standard “Teacher of an Institution of General Secondary Education”]. Retrieved from https://register.nqa.gov.ua/uploads/0/646-ilovepdf_merged.pdf.
Ragozina, V. V. (2017). Besida yak instrument orhanizatsii spryimannia ta obhovorennia tvoriv zhyvopysu z ditmy: typy i pedahohichnyi suprovid [Conversation as a tool for organizing the perception and discussion of works of art with children: types and pedagogical support]. Teoretyko-metodychni problemy vykhovannia ditei ta uchnivskoi molodi, 21(2), 197-208. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Tmpvd_2017_21(2)__20
Ragozina, V. V. (2018). Spryimannia ta obhovorennia kartyn iz doshkilnykamy: vitchyzniani y zarubizhni pidkhody [Perception and discussion of paintings with preschoolers: domestic and foreign approaches]. Aktualni pytannia mystetskoi osvity ta vykhovannia, 2, 226-233. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/apmov_2018_2_25
Ragozina, V. V. (2021). Tekhnolohiia pedahohichnoho suprovodu spryimannia tvoriv zhyvopysu ditmy 3-ho roku zhyttia [Technology of pedagogical support of perception of paintings by children of the 3rd year of life]. Mystetstvo ta Osvita [Art and Education], 4(102), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.32405/2308-8885-2021-4(102)-16-22
Kurkov, A., Puchkov, A., Raffensperger, K., Klochko, D., Yaremenko, M., Lozhkina, A., Mudrak, M., Soloviov, O., & Burlaka, V. (2024). Skarby Ukrainy: Kulturna spadshchyna natsii [Treasures of Ukraine: Cultural heritage of the nation]. Kyiv: ArtHuss.
Yamnytska, T. O. (2019). Opys, analiz y interpretatsiia tvoriv dekoratyvno-prykladnoho mystetstva [Description, analysis and interpretation of works of arts and crafts]. Mystetstvo ta Osvita [Art and Education], 1(91), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.32405/2308-8885-2019-1-8
