Artistic communication in the field of artistic education: Theory, practice, innovation
Keywords:
artistic communication, art, artistic education, subject and object of communication, virtual reality, artistic knowledgeAbstract
The article focuses on the role of artistic education as an important factor of formation of artistic perception in the educational environment. Theoretical analysis of the phenomenon of “artistic communication” in the context of formation of modern artistic education has been carried out. The purpose of the article is to identify features of artistic communication through the prism of the interaction between subjects and objects of artistic activity as a specific form of information transmission by means of art; to outline new facets of artistic education as an important factor of the formation of artistic perception in the educational environment. The innovative form of artistic communication, implemented in a higher education institution, is an important factor of formation of the communicative competence of future teachers of artistic specialties. Artistic communication as a holistic activity with the intellectual and emotional component creates favorable conditions for person’s development of potential creative possibilities through the spiritualized way of educational action (living and experiencing in action), aimed at the realization of person’s own self, which fully corresponds to humanitarian nature of modern pedagogical education with its humanistic orientation. Implementing in general education institutions of the content communication line “Communication through Art” (the educational branch of “Art”) provide, first of all, the formation of students’ skills in presenting their own artistic achievements, the ability to communicate with others through art and with art, consciously enjoying the diversity of inter-artistic interaction (inter-medial aspect).
The author concludes that: artistic communication as a holistic kind of pedagogical activity contributes to the development of personality’s potential creative abilities through the sensory experience of educational actions; artistic communication as an important component of artistic education develops under the influence of modern information and communication processes caused by scientific and technological progress; artistic communication involves the interaction not only of subjects but also objects of the communicative process, which include: artistic work, the author’s image, society, historical epoch, artistic process.
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1979). Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow:
Berehova, O. (2006). Komunikatsiia v sotsiokulturnomu prostori Ukrainy: tekhnolohiia chy tvorchist? [Communication in the socio-cultural space of Ukraine: Technology or creativity?]. Kyiv: NMAU im. P.I. Chaikovskoho.
Bibler, V. S. (2018). Kultura. Dialoh kultur [Culture. Dialogue of cultures]. Kyiv: DUKh I LITERA.
Dzoban, O. P., & Manuilov, Ye. M. (2015). Virtualni komunikatsii: do problemy filosofskoho osmyslennia sutnosti [Virtual communications: To the problem of philosophical comprehension of the essence]. In Visnyk natsionalnoho universytetu «Iurydychna akademiia Ukrainy imeni Yaroslava Mudroho»: Vol. 3 (26) (pp. 7–19).
Zamorkin, A. O. (2013). Virtualni komunikatsii yak sotsiokulturnyi fenomen suchasnosti [Virtual communications as a socio-cultural phenomenon of the present] (Doctoral dissertation, Moscow).
Kozakova, V. S. Problema khudozhnoi komunikatsii v kulturno-estetychnii diisnosti [The problem of artistic communication in the cultural and aesthetic realities]. In V kulturolohichni chytannia pamiati Volodymyra Pidkopaieva: Conference Proceedings. Retrieved from http://www.culturalstudies.in.ua/sekcia_s_s2_2.php
Komarovska, O. (2018). Mystetstvo v novii ukrainskii shkoli: shcho zminylosia? [Art in the New Ukrainian School: What has been changed?]. In Pochatkova osvita: metodychni rekomendatsii (pp. 122–125). Kyiv: UOVTs «Orion».
Krupa, M. P. (2005). Linhvistychnyi analiz khudozhnoho tekstu [Linguistic analysis of artistic text]. Ternopil: Pidruchnyky i posibnyky.
Kulka, I. (2014). Psikhologiia iskusstva [Psychology of art]. Kharkov: Izd-vo Gumanytarnyi Tsentr – Oliva I.V.
Lazarieva, L. M. (2011). Khudozhnia komunikatsiia ta ii osoblyvosti v suchasnomu Internet-prostori [Artistic communication and its features in the modern Internet space]. Obrazotvorche Mystetstvo, 1, 96–99.
Lanovyk, M. B. (2006). Teoriia vidnosnosti khudozhnoho perekladu: literaturoznavchi proektsii [Theory of relativity of artistic translation: Literary projections]. Ternopil: Red.-vydav. Viddil TNPU.
Marina, L. P. (2000). Virtualnyi modus kultury: tekst kak spetsialnaia forma vyrazheniia avtorskogo soznaniia [Virtual mode of culture: Text as a special form of expression of the author’s consciousness]. In Virtualnoe prostranstvo kultury: Conference Proceedings (pp. 108–111). St. Petersburg: Filosofskoe Obshchestvo.
Nazaikinskii, E. V. (1982). Logika muzykalnoi kompozitsii [Logic of musical composition]. Moscow:
Shevelov, Yu. (1992). Oleksandr Potebnia. Sproba rekonstruktsii ilisnoho obrazu [Alexander Potebnia. Attempt to reconstruct a holistic image]. In Ukrainska mova: istoriia i styli (pp. 5–44). Kharkiv: Osnova.
