Influence of culture and art on the formation of the value- sense sphere of a personality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32405/2308-8885-2020-1-9-13Keywords:
culture, values, meanings, value-semantic sphere, art, personality, value orientationsAbstract
The author of the article considers the essence of the value-sense sphere of a personality as a result of appropriation of culture by a personality. The value-sense sphere is characterized as an integrative personal formation, the specific features of which are represented by values, value orientations, and personal senses; as a complex formation in which a person, a personality, an individual, consciousness and self-consciousness, the inner world of a personality, the content and strategies of life, self-determination, behavior, actions, creativity are involved.
The problem of interaction of the value-sense sphere of a personality and culture is considered by the author in the context of spiritual development and spiritual impoverishment of the individual. The article actualizes the problem of increasing disregard for national cultural values and national art. It is emphasized that the value-sense sphere of a personality is determined by the cultural-historical being of the individual. It is through culture the choice of sense-vital and sense-value orientations, which have an ideal orientation and spiritual and moral content, are made by a personality.
It has been determined that the modern information space has a significant influence on the formation of the value-sense sphere of the individual. The value and civilizational realities of the modern world testify to their considerable alienation from everything that is inherent in human beings, culture, art, and from a man himself. The views of home and foreign scientists, philosophers, psychologists and educators on the essence of the interaction of the value-sense sphere of personality and culture have been analyzed. Emphasis is placed on the close relationship between culture and education, which is manifested in the service of a common goal - the improvement of the human personality.
References
Baeva, L.V. (2003). Tsennostnye osnovaniia individualnogo bytiia: Opyt ekzistentsialnoi aksiologii [Value foundations of individual being: The experience of existential axiology]. Moscow: Prometei. MPGU.
Baryshnikov,V. P. (2005). Aksiologiia lichnostnogo bytiia [Axiology of personal being]. Moscow: Logos.
Vegas, Kh.M. (2007). Tsennosti i vospitanie. Kritika nravstvennogo reliativizma [Values and education. Criticism of moral relativism]. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta; Izd-vo Rus. hrist. gumanit. akad.
Leontiev,O. M. (1972). Problemy rozvytku psikhiki [Problems of development of psychics]. Moscow: Iz-vo MGU.
Olport,G. V. (1998). Lichnost v psikhologii [Personality in psychology]. Moscow: Yuventa.
Sorokin,P. A. (1992). Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiia. Obshchestvo [Person. Civilization. Society]. Moscow: Politizdat.
Lanovenko, O.P. (2004). XXI vek: mir mezhdu proshlym i budushchim. Kultura kak sistemoobrazuiushchii factor mezhdunarodnoi i natsionalnoi bezopasnosti [XXI century: The world between the past and the future. Culture as a system-forming factor in international and national security]. Kyiv: Stilos.
Tarnas,R. (1995). Istoriia zapadnogo myshleniia [History of Western thinking]. Moscow: KRON-PRESS.
Hantington,S. (1999). Novaia postindustrialnaya volna na zapade. Аntologiia. [A new post-industrial wave in the West]. Moscow.
Sharov,A. S. (2000). Ogranichenny chelovek: znachimost, aktivnost, refleksiia [The limited human: Significance, activity, reflection]. Omsk: Izd-vo Omsk gos. ped. un-ta.
Schafer,D. P. (2017). Kulturnaia lichnost [Cultural personality]. Kyiv: Pedagogichna Dumka.
Yung,K. G. (2006). Probemy dushi nashego vremeni [Soul problems of the present time]. Moscow: Finta.
Ken Wilber (1990). Eye to Eye as referred to in R. Ralston. Teaching the stones to Speak.Vision Action Conference Assembly of B.C. Arts Councils. Kelowna.
